Osio
Johdanto ja osion tavoitteet
Ennakkotehtävä
Oppimateriaali
Oheismateriaali;
Data-aineisto harjoituksiin
Harjoitus
Itsearviointi
tyhjä
Sulje ikkuna

Diskurssianalyysi

Oheismateriaali

Sosiaalisen vuorovaikutuksen ja diskurssin tutkimuskirjallisuutta:

Antaki, C. (1988). Analyzing everyday explanation: A casebook of methods. Worcester: Sage.

Atkinson, P. (1985). Language, structure and reproduction: An introduction to the sociology of Basil Bernstein. London: Methuen.

Bakhtin, M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays, ed. C. Emerson and M. Holoquuist. Austin: University of Texas Press.

Barnes, D. & Todd, F. (1977/1994). Communication and learning in small groups: London. Routledge.

Barthes, R. (1967). Elements of semiology. Cape: London.

Brown, A.J. & Renshaw, P.D. (2000). Collective argumentation: A sociocultural approach to reframing classroom teaching and learning. Teoksessa H. Cowie & G. van der Aalsvoort (toim.) Social interaction in learning and instruction. Amsterdam: Pergamon, 52-66.

Brown, G. & Yule, G. (1983). Discourse analysis. Cambridge University Press.

Bruner, J. (1983). Child’s talk. London: Oxford University Press.

Bruner, J. (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Casey, K. (1995-96). The new narrative research in education. In M. Apple (ed.), Review of Research in Education, 21, 211-253.

Cazden, C. (1988). Classroom discourse. Portsmouth: Heinemann.

Chan, C.K.K. (2001). Peer collaboration and discourse patterns in learning from incompatible information. Instructional Science 29, 443-479.

Cowie, H. & van der Aalsvoort G. (Eds.) (2000). Social interaction in learning and instruction. The meaning of discourse for the construction of knowledge. Amsterdam: Pergamon.

Edwards, A. & Furlong, J. (1978). The language of teaching. London: Heinemann.

Edwards, D. & Mercer, N. (1987). Common knowledge: The development of understanding in the classroom. London: Routledge.

Edwards, D. & Westgate, D. (1994). Investigating classroom talk (2. Painos). Basingstoke: Falmer Press.

Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Fairclough, N. (1993). Critical discourse analysis and the marketization of public discourse. The universities. Discourse and Society, 4, 133-168.

Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis. The critical study of language. London: Longman.

Fernandez, M., Wegerif, R., Mercer, N., & Rojas-Drummond, S. (2001). Re-conceptualizing “scaffolding” and the zone of proximal development in the context of symmetrical collaborative learning. Journal of Classroom Interaction 36 (2).

Fisher, E. (1993). Distinctive features of pupil-pupil classroom talk and their relationship to learning: How discursive exploration might be encouraged. Language and Education 7 (4), 239-257.

Forman, E.A. (1989). The role of peer interaction in the social construction of mathematical knowledge. International Journal of Educational Research 13, 55-70.

Forman, E.A. & Cazden, C.B. (1985). Exploring Vygotskian perspectives in education: The cognitive value of peer interaction. Teoksessa J. Wertsch (toim.) Culture, communication, and cognition: Vygotskian perrspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 323-347.

Gee, P. G. (1999). An introduction to discourse analysis. Theory and method. New York: Routledge.

Green, J. & Harker, J. (Eds.) (1988). Multiple perspective analyses of classroom discourse. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Habermas, J. (1974). Theory and practice. London: Heinemann.

Hakulinen, A. (1996). Kieli — suomalaisen keskustelun keinoja II. Helsingin yliopisto, suomenkielen laitos.

Halliday, M.A.K. (1978). Language as a social semiotic: Social interpretation of language and meaning. Lomdon: Edward Arnold.

Halliday, M.A.K. (1985). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold.

Hasan, R. (1989). Speech genre, semiotic mediation and development of higher mental functions, Language Sciences, 14(1), 489-528.

Hirsjärvi, S., Böök, M.L. & Penttinen, L. (1996). ”Sit me ruvetaan oleen tieteellisiä subjekteja” – Tieteellisyyden rakentuminen opiskelijadiskurssissa. Teoksessa L. Laurinen, M-R. Luukka, & K. Sajavaara (toim.) Seminaaridiskurssi – diskursseja seminaarista. Jyväskylän yliopisto. Soveltavan kielentutkimuksen keskus, 163-190.

Hogan, K., Nastasi, B.K., & Pressley, M. (2000). Discourse patterns and collaborative scientific reasoning in peer and teacher-guided discussions. Cognition and Instruction 17 (4), 379-432.

Hoikkala, T. (1993). Kieli, kertomus ja kulttuuri

Jokinen, A. et. al. (1993). Diskurssanalyysin aakkoset

Jokinen, A., Juhila, K., & Suoninen, E. (1993). Diskurssianalyysin aakkoset. Tampere: Vastapaino.

Jokinen, Juhila & Suoninen. (1993). Diskurssiananlyysin aakkoset. Tampere: Vastapaino.

Kaartinen, S. & Kumpulainen, K. (2001). Negotiating meaning in science classroom communities: Cases across age levels. Journal of Classroom Interaction 36 (2), 4-16.

Kaartinen, S. & Kumpulainen, K. (2002). Collaborative inquiry and the construction of explanations in the learning of science. Learning and Instruction, 12(2), 189-212.

Kovalainen, M., Kumpulainen, K., & Vasama, S. (2001). Orchestrating classroom interaction in a community of inquiry: Modes of teacher participation. Journal of Classroom Interaction 36 (2), 17-28.

Kress, G. & Threadgold, T. (1988). Towards a social theory of genre. Southern Review 21.

Kuhn, D. (1991). The skills of argument. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Kumpulainen, K. & Wray, D. (Eds.) (2002). Classroom interaction and social learning. London: RoutledgeFalmer.

Kumpulainen, K. (1996). The nature of peer interaction in the social context created by the use of word processors. Learning and Instruction, 6, 243-261.

Kumpulainen, K. & Mutanen, M. (1998). Collaborative practice of science construction in a computer-based multimedia environment. Computers and Education, 30, 75-85.

Kumpulainen, K. & Mutanen, M. (1999). The situated dynamics of peer group interaction: An introduction to an analytic framework. Learning and Instruction, 9, 449-474.

Kumpulainen, K. & Mutanen, M. (1999). Interaktiotutkimus sosiokulturaalisen ja konstruktivistisen oppimisnäkemyksen viitekehyksessä. Kasvatus, 1, 5-17.

Kumpulainen, K. & Kaartinen, S. (2000). Situational mechanisms of peer group interaction in collaborative meaning-making. European Journal of Psychology of Education, XV(4), 431-454.

Kumpulainen, K. & van der Aalsvoort, G. (2001). Negotiating meaning in a community of learners. Introduction to a special theme issue. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 36(2), 1-3.

Kumpulainen, K. & van der Aalsvoort, G. (2001). Negotiating meaning in a community of learners. Discussion. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 36(2), 74-76.

Kumpulainen, K., Salovaara, H., & Mutanen, M. (2001). Sociocognitive processes and constructive activity in handling and processing multimedia-based science material in a small group learning task. Instructional Science 29, 481-515.

Kumpulainen, K. (2002). Yhteistoiminnallinen oppiminen vertaisryhmässä: Tutkimuskatsaus. Kasvatus, 3, 252-265.

Lemke, J. (1989). Analysing classroom talk. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Levison, S.C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Markova, I. & Foppa, K. (toim.) (1991). Asymmetries in Dialogue. Exeter: Harvester Wheatseaf.

Mason, L. (1998). Sharing cognition to construct scientific knowledge in school context: The role of oral and written discourse. Instructional Science 26 (5), 359-389.

Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons: Social organization in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Mellar, H. & Howell-Rischardson, C. (1999). Techniques for analysing online interaction. In M.

Mercer, N. (2000). Words and minds: How we use language to think together. London: Routledge.

Newman, D.R., Johnson, C., Cochrane, C., & Webb, B. (1996). An experiment in group learning technology: Evaluating critical thinking in face-to-face and computer supported seminars. Interpersonal Computing and Technology 4(1), 57-74.

Niaz, M. (1995). Cognitive conflict as a teaching strategy in solving chemistry problems: A dialectic constructivist perspective. Journal of Researh in Science Teaching 32 (9), 959-970.

Nikander, P. (1997). Diskursiivinen käänne (sosiaali)psykologiassa. Psykologia, 32, 404-414.

Palincsar, A.S. (1986). The role of dialogue in providing scaffolded instruction. Educational Psychologist 21, 73-98.

Potter, J. & Wetherell, M. (1987) Discourse and social psychology, beyond attitudes and behaviour. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.

Potter, J. & Wetherell, M. (1995). Discourse analysis. Teoksessa J. A. Smith, R. Harré, & van Langenhov (toim.), Rethinking Methods in Psychology. London: Sage.

Resnick, L., Salmon, M., Zeitz, C.M., Wathen, S.H., & Holowchak, M. (1993). Reasoning in conversation. Cognition and Instruction 11, 347-364.

Ruberg, L.F., Moore, D.M., & Taylor, C.D. (1996). Student participation, interaction and regulation in a computer-mediated communication environment: A qualitative study. Journal of Educational Computing Research 14 (3), 243-268.

Sinclair, J. McH. & Coulthard, R. M. (1975). Towards an analysis of discourse. Oxford: University Press.

Selinger & J. Pearson (Eds.), Telematics in education: Trends and issues. Amsterdam: Pergamon, 88-104.

Suoranta (1995). Tekstit, murrokset ja muutos. Acta Universitatis Lapponiosis 10, Rovaniemi: Lapin yliopistopaino.

Suoranta, J. (1991). Piileekö kasvatus kielessä - diskurssianalyysistä kasvatustieteelisenä lähestymistapana. Kasvatus 22, 410-419.

Sinclair, J. & Coulthard, M. (1975). Towards an analysis of discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Threadgold, T. (1989). Talking about genre: Ideologies and incompatible discourse. Cultural studies 3 (1).

Valo, M. (2000). Tietokonevälitteinen vuorovaikutus. Teoksessa H-P. Lappalainen (toim.) Virikkeitä viestintävalmiuksien arviointiin. Opetushallitus. Arviointi 3/2000. Helsinki: Yliopistopaino. 39-53.

Van Boxtel, C.A.M. (2000). Collaborative concept learning. Collaborative learning tasks, student interaction and learning of physics concepts. Enschede: PrintPartners Ipskamp.

Van Leeuwen, T. (1993). Genre and field in critical discourse analysis: A synopsis. Discourse & Society 4(2), 193-219.

Vygotski, L. (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T.Press.

Vygotski, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Wegerif, R. & Mercer, N. (1997). A dialogical framework for researching peer talk. Teoksessa R. Wegerif & P. Scrimshaw (toim.) Computers and talk in the primary classroom. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, 49-61.

Wells, G. & Chang-Wells, G.L. (1992). Constructing knowledge together: Classrooms as centers of inquiry and literacy. Portsmouth, NH: Heineman.

Wells, G. (1999). Dialogic inquiry. Towards a sociocultural practice and theory of education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Tieteellisiä aikakausilehtiä:
Discourse processes
Discourse and society
Journal of Classroom Interaction
Learning and Instruction
HUOM! Tämä luettelo ei ole kaikenkattava.

sivun alkuun